SCOTLAND’s planning services could have become a barrier to economic recovery when they stalled during the first coronavirus lockdown, a conference has heard.
However, the Scottish Government’s chief planner told the Scottish Policy Conference on the National Planning Framework (NPF) that planners had risen to the challenge, through measures to keep the processes going to allow development to progress as soon as restrictions are eased.
John McNairney said the Planning Act – which is still being implemented – had also provided some of the tools required to make the system more inclusive and influential.
“Last March we faced a risk that our planning services could stall and we had no idea how long that might have lasted,” he said.
“Scotland’s planning system could well have become a barrier to our economic recovery, but planning and planners rose to the challenge that we had at that time.
“Some swift cross-sector collaboration and urgent action allowed us to make a suite of temporary changes to the planning legislation, including emergency legislation that removed barriers across planning processes, so that we could still find ways to communicate to engage to make decisions, and so that development could progress on the ground, as soon as restrictions were eased.
“Another way that planning responded really effectively was by relaxing some controls … so that businesses could diversify and keep people in jobs, for example by extending hours of operation on construction sites or for retail deliveries and allowing outdoor hospitality. They’re still in place, they’re quite clearly still needed just now, and we’ll only remove them when the time is right for that.”
McNairney said all of us should be moving towards recognising that our town centres had to be more mixed and open to helping facilitate people coming back to live in them after decades of being left deserted, largely through out-of-town developments.
He said town centres still offered many benefits, adding: “We can look to improve the quality of our town centres, and in the short term we can try and help to make it easier for people to access services in town centres. I think that we need to be more open to a stronger blend of uses in town centres, and we need to be really hawkish about further eroding the vital vitality and viability of town centres by moving out.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here